2012 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.2 TDCi (150 Hp) 2012Overall Score65.5/100
2012 Ford Ranger vs 2012 Citroen C5 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Citroen
C5
Citroen C5 2.0 HDi (140 Hp) 2012Overall Score64.75/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationCitroen C5
FordMakeCitroen
RangerModelC5
2012Model year2012
Pick-upBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationCitroen C5
12,3 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
175 km/hTop speed205 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
150 HPPower140 HP
375 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationCitroen C5
DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank71 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationCitroen C5
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
255/70 R16; 255/55 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationCitroen C5
5359 mmLength4779 mm
1850 mmWidth1860 mm
1815 mmHeight1451-1458 mm
2048 KgWeight1608 Kg
3220 mmWheelbase2815 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Ford Ranger and 2012 Citroen C5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…