DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Mazda 6 vs 2015 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Ranger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

72.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 6SpecificationFord Ranger
MazdaMakeFord
6ModelRanger
2015Model year2015
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Mazda 6SpecificationFord Ranger
9,0 s0–100 km/h—
211 km/hTop speed165 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
150 HPPower130 HP
380 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 6SpecificationFord Ranger
DieselFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank80 lt
5,1 ltUrban consumption—
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,1 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 6SpecificationFord Ranger
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/70 R16; 255/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 6SpecificationFord Ranger
4865 mmLength5277-5354 mm
1840 mmWidth1860 mm
1450 mmHeight1815 mm
1405 KgWeight1883 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase3220 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Mazda 6 and 2015 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…