2015 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.2 TDCi (125 Hp) 2015Overall Score64.5/100
2015 Ford Ranger vs 2015 Volvo V40 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2015 • Volvo
V40
Volvo V40 2.0 T2 (122 Hp) 2015Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Volvo V40
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationVolvo V40
FordMakeVolvo
RangerModelV40
2015Model year2015
Pick-upBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationVolvo V40
14,9 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
175 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
125 HPPower122 HP
320 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationVolvo V40
DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank62 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption—
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,6 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationVolvo V40
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
255/70 R16; 255/55 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationVolvo V40
5359 mmLength4369 mm
1850 mmWidth1857 mm
1815 mmHeight1439 mm
2048 KgWeight—
3220 mmWheelbase2647 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2015 Ford Ranger and 2015 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…