2015 • Volvo
V40
Volvo V40 2.0 T2 (122 Hp) 2015Overall Score65.25/100
2015 Volvo V40 vs 2015 Ford Ranger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2015 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.2 TDCi (125 Hp) 2015Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Volvo V40
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V40SpecificationFord Ranger
VolvoMakeFord
V40ModelRanger
2015Model year2015
HatchbackBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Volvo V40SpecificationFord Ranger
9,8 s0–100 km/h14,9 s
190 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1969 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
122 HPPower125 HP
220 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V40SpecificationFord Ranger
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption8,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,2 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption7,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V40SpecificationFord Ranger
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size255/70 R16; 255/55 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V40SpecificationFord Ranger
4369 mmLength5359 mm
1857 mmWidth1850 mm
1439 mmHeight1815 mm
—Weight2048 Kg
2647 mmWheelbase3220 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2015 Volvo V40 and 2015 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…