2015 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.2 TDCi (125 Hp) 2015Overall Score64.5/100
2015 Ford Ranger vs 2015 Mazda 3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2015 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 2.0 SkyActiv-G (120 Hp) 2015Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda 3
FordMakeMazda
RangerModel3
2015Model year2015
Pick-upBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda 3
14,9 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
175 km/hTop speed195 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
125 HPPower120 HP
320 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda 3
DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank51 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
7,6 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda 3
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
255/70 R16; 255/55 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda 3
5359 mmLength4460 mm
1850 mmWidth1795 mm
1815 mmHeight1450 mm
2048 KgWeight1205 Kg
3220 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2015 Ford Ranger and 2015 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…