2015 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.2 TDCi (125 Hp) 2015Overall Score64.5/100
2015 Ford Ranger vs 2015 Kia Optima Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2015 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0i 16V Hybrid (177 Hp) 2015Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationKia Optima
FordMakeKia
RangerModelOptima
2015Model year2015
Pick-upBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationKia Optima
14,9 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
175 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
125 HPPower150 HP
320 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationKia Optima
DieselFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
80 ltFuel tank65 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption5,9 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
7,6 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationKia Optima
4x4Drivetrain—
6Gears—
255/70 R16; 255/55 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationKia Optima
5359 mmLength4845 mm
1850 mmWidth1830 mm
1815 mmHeight1455 mm
2048 KgWeight1587-1648 Kg
3220 mmWheelbase2795 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2015 Ford Ranger and 2015 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…