DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Ford Ranger vs 2013 Opel Cascada Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
RESULT

Tie

The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score.

62.5–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeOpel
RangerModelCascada
2013Model year2013
Pick-upBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

14,9 s0–100 km/h10,9 s
175 km/hTop speed207 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement1362 cc
125 HPPower140 HP
320 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank56 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
7,6 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
255/70 R16; 255/55 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5359 mmLength4696 mm
1850 mmWidth1839 mm
1815 mmHeight1443 mm
2048 KgWeight1701-1816 Kg
3220 mmWheelbase2695 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Ford Ranger and 2013 Opel Cascada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score. The better choice therefore depends more heavily on priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance and equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…