DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 SsangYong Chairman vs 2013 Ford Ranger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Chairman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeFord
ChairmanModelRanger
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

11,6 s0–100 km/h14,9 s
197 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2295 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
150 HPPower125 HP
220 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
15,3 ltUrban consumption8,3 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
—Average consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
215/60 R16Tyre size255/70 R16; 255/55 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5055 mmLength5359 mm
1825 mmWidth1850 mm
1465 mmHeight1815 mm
1700 KgWeight2048 Kg
2900 mmWheelbase3220 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 SsangYong Chairman and 2013 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Chairman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…