DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Puma vs 2003 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Puma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford PumaSpecificationAudi A3
FordMakeAudi
PumaModelA3
2003Model year2003
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2+2Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

Ford PumaSpecificationAudi A3
9,2 s0–100 km/h10,9 s
203 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1679 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
125 HPPower115 HP
157 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford PumaSpecificationAudi A3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford PumaSpecificationAudi A3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/50 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford PumaSpecificationAudi A3
3984 mmLength4203 mm
1674 mmWidth1765 mm
1345 mmHeight1421 mm
1040 KgWeight1225 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Puma and 2003 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Puma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…