DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Audi A3 vs 2003 Ford Puma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Puma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A3SpecificationFord Puma
AudiMakeFord
A3ModelPuma
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
3Doors3

Performance

Audi A3SpecificationFord Puma
10,9 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
196 km/hTop speed203 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1679 cc
115 HPPower125 HP
155 NmTorque157 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A3SpecificationFord Puma
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank42 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A3SpecificationFord Puma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size195/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi A3SpecificationFord Puma
4203 mmLength3984 mm
1765 mmWidth1674 mm
1421 mmHeight1345 mm
1225 KgWeight1040 Kg
2578 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Audi A3 and 2003 Ford Puma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Puma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…