2003 • Ford
Puma
Ford Puma 1.6 i 16V (103 Hp) 2003Overall Score51.25/100
2003 Ford Puma vs 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 1.6 i 16V (98 Hp) 2003Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
Ford Puma
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford PumaSpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
FordMakeMitsubishi
PumaModelLancer
2003Model year2003
CoupeBody typeEstate
2+2Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Ford PumaSpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
10,4 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
190 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1584 cc
103 HPPower98 HP
145 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford PumaSpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
—Average consumption7,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford PumaSpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford PumaSpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
3984 mmLength4485 mm
1674 mmWidth1695 mm
1345 mmHeight1480 mm
1035 KgWeight1360 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Ford Puma and 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Puma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…