2003 • Fiat
Punto
Fiat Punto 1.4 (95 Hp) 2003Overall Score50.25/100
2003 Fiat Punto vs 2003 Ford Puma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Ford
Puma
Ford Puma 1.6 i 16V (103 Hp) 2003Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
Ford Puma
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat PuntoSpecificationFord Puma
FiatMakeFord
PuntoModelPuma
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
3Doors3
Performance
Fiat PuntoSpecificationFord Puma
9,9 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
178 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
95 HPPower103 HP
128 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat PuntoSpecificationFord Puma
PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank40 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat PuntoSpecificationFord Puma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R14Tyre size195/50 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Fiat PuntoSpecificationFord Puma
3840 mmLength3984 mm
1660 mmWidth1674 mm
1480 mmHeight1345 mm
960 KgWeight1035 Kg
2460 mmWheelbase2446 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Fiat Punto and 2003 Ford Puma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Puma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…