2003 • Ford
Puma
Ford Puma 1.6 i 16V (103 Hp) 2003Overall Score51.25/100
2003 Ford Puma vs 2003 Fiat Punto Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Fiat
Punto
Fiat Punto 1.4 (95 Hp) 2003Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
Ford Puma
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford PumaSpecificationFiat Punto
FordMakeFiat
PumaModelPunto
2003Model year2003
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2+2Seats5
3Doors3
Performance
Ford PumaSpecificationFiat Punto
10,4 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
190 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
103 HPPower95 HP
145 NmTorque128 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford PumaSpecificationFiat Punto
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank47 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
—Average consumption6,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford PumaSpecificationFiat Punto
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size165/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford PumaSpecificationFiat Punto
3984 mmLength3840 mm
1674 mmWidth1660 mm
1345 mmHeight1480 mm
1035 KgWeight960 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2460 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Ford Puma and 2003 Fiat Punto approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Puma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…