2000 • Ford
Puma
Ford Puma 1.4 16V (90 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
2000 Ford Puma vs 1999 Opel Corsa Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Opel
Corsa
Opel Corsa 1.4 (90 Hp) 1999Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Ford Puma
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford PumaSpecificationOpel Corsa
FordMakeOpel
PumaModelCorsa
2000Model year1999
CoupeBody typeEstate
2+2Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Ford PumaSpecificationOpel Corsa
11,9 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
180 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1388 ccEngine displacement1389 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
125 NmTorque125 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford PumaSpecificationOpel Corsa
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank46 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford PumaSpecificationOpel Corsa
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford PumaSpecificationOpel Corsa
3984 mmLength4026 mm
1674 mmWidth1610 mm
1345 mmHeight1465 mm
1035 KgWeight1000 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2443 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Ford Puma and 1999 Opel Corsa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Puma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…