1999 • Ford
Fiesta
Ford Fiesta 1.4 i 16V (90 Hp) 1999Overall Score46.25/100
1999 Ford Fiesta vs 2000 Ford Puma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Ford
Puma
Ford Puma 1.4 16V (90 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Ford Puma
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FiestaSpecificationFord Puma
FordMakeFord
FiestaModelPuma
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
3/5Doors3
Performance
Ford FiestaSpecificationFord Puma
10,8 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
182 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1388 ccEngine displacement1388 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
125 NmTorque125 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FiestaSpecificationFord Puma
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank42 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FiestaSpecificationFord Puma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R14Tyre size195/50 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford FiestaSpecificationFord Puma
3828 mmLength3984 mm
1634 mmWidth1674 mm
1320 mmHeight1345 mm
950 KgWeight1035 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2446 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Ford Fiesta and 2000 Ford Puma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Puma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…