2000 • Ford
Puma
Ford Puma 1.4 16V (90 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
2000 Ford Puma vs 1999 Opel Astra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Opel
Astra
Opel Astra 1.4 Ecotec 16V (90 Hp) 1999Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Ford Puma
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford PumaSpecificationOpel Astra
FordMakeOpel
PumaModelAstra
2000Model year1999
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2+2Seats5
3Doors3/5
Performance
Ford PumaSpecificationOpel Astra
11,9 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
180 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1388 ccEngine displacement1389 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
125 NmTorque125 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford PumaSpecificationOpel Astra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank52 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
—Average consumption7,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford PumaSpecificationOpel Astra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford PumaSpecificationOpel Astra
3984 mmLength4110 mm
1674 mmWidth1709 mm
1345 mmHeight1425 mm
1035 KgWeight1090 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2606 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Ford Puma and 1999 Opel Astra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Puma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…