2000 • Ford
Puma
Ford Puma 1.4 16V (90 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
2000 Ford Puma vs 1996 Alfa Romeo 146 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Alfa Romeo
146
Alfa Romeo 146 1.4 i.e. (90 Hp) 1996Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Ford Puma
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford PumaSpecificationAlfa Romeo 146
FordMakeAlfa Romeo
PumaModel146
2000Model year1996
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2+2Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Ford PumaSpecificationAlfa Romeo 146
11,9 s0–100 km/h12,8 s
180 km/hTop speed179 km/h
1388 ccEngine displacement1351 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
125 NmTorque115 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford PumaSpecificationAlfa Romeo 146
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank51 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption—
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford PumaSpecificationAlfa Romeo 146
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford PumaSpecificationAlfa Romeo 146
3984 mmLength4257 mm
1674 mmWidth1712 mm
1345 mmHeight1425 mm
1035 KgWeight1175 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2540 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Ford Puma and 1996 Alfa Romeo 146 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Puma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…