1997 • Ford
Puma
Ford Puma 1.4 16V (90 Hp) 1997Overall Score46.25/100
1997 Ford Puma vs 1996 Opel Vectra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Opel
Vectra
Opel Vectra 1.7 TD (82 Hp) 1996Overall Score45.25/100
WINNER
Ford Puma
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–45.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford PumaSpecificationOpel Vectra
FordMakeOpel
PumaModelVectra
1997Model year1996
CoupeBody typeSedan
2+2Seats5
3Doors4
Performance
Ford PumaSpecificationOpel Vectra
11,9 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
180 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1388 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
90 HPPower82 HP
125 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford PumaSpecificationOpel Vectra
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
—Average consumption5,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford PumaSpecificationOpel Vectra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R15Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford PumaSpecificationOpel Vectra
3984 mmLength4495 mm
1674 mmWidth1707 mm
1345 mmHeight1425 mm
1035 KgWeight1260 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2637 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1997 Ford Puma and 1996 Opel Vectra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Puma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…