1996 • Opel
Vectra
Opel Vectra 1.7 TD (82 Hp) 1996Overall Score45.25/100
1996 Opel Vectra vs 1997 Ford Puma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Ford
Puma
Ford Puma 1.4 16V (90 Hp) 1997Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Ford Puma
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
45.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel VectraSpecificationFord Puma
OpelMakeFord
VectraModelPuma
1996Model year1997
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
4Doors3
Performance
Opel VectraSpecificationFord Puma
15,5 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
175 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1388 cc
82 HPPower90 HP
168 NmTorque125 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel VectraSpecificationFord Puma
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank42 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Opel VectraSpecificationFord Puma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size195/50 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel VectraSpecificationFord Puma
4495 mmLength3984 mm
1707 mmWidth1674 mm
1425 mmHeight1345 mm
1260 KgWeight1035 Kg
2637 mmWheelbase2446 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Opel Vectra and 1997 Ford Puma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Puma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…