1997 • Ford
Puma
Ford Puma 1.4 16V (90 Hp) 1997Overall Score46.25/100
1997 Ford Puma vs 2000 Holden Barina Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Holden
Barina
Holden Barina 1.4 i 16V Swing (90 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Holden Barina
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford PumaSpecificationHolden Barina
FordMakeHolden
PumaModelBarina
1997Model year2000
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2+2Seats5
3Doors3
Performance
Ford PumaSpecificationHolden Barina
11,9 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
180 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1388 ccEngine displacement1389 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
125 NmTorque125 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford PumaSpecificationHolden Barina
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank46 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption—
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption7,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford PumaSpecificationHolden Barina
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/50 R15Tyre size165/70 R13 T
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford PumaSpecificationHolden Barina
3984 mmLength3741 mm
1674 mmWidth1608 mm
1345 mmHeight1420 mm
1035 KgWeight1420 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2443 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1997 Ford Puma and 2000 Holden Barina approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Holden Barina leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…