E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Mustang vs 2016 Mercedes-Benz CLS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercedes-Benz CLS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 14.75 points.

83.75–98.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford MustangSpecificationMercedes-Benz CLS
FordMakeMercedes-Benz
MustangModelCLS
2016Model year2016
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
4Seats4/5
2Doors4

Performance

Ford MustangSpecificationMercedes-Benz CLS
—0–100 km/h4,2 s
0 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4951 ccEngine displacement5461 cc
426 HPPower557 HP
529 NmTorque720 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Ford MustangSpecificationMercedes-Benz CLS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank66 lt
15,7 ltUrban consumption13,9 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
12,4 ltAverage consumption9,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford MustangSpecificationMercedes-Benz CLS
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears7 MCT
235/50 R18Tyre size255/35 ZR 19; 285/30 ZR 19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford MustangSpecificationMercedes-Benz CLS
4783 mmLength4937 mm
1915 mmWidth1881 mm
1394 mmHeight1418 mm
—Weight1870 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2874 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Mustang and 2016 Mercedes-Benz CLS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercedes-Benz CLS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 14.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

2013 Land Rover DiscoveryVS2016 Ford MustangLand Rover Discovery vs Ford Mustang2013 and 2016 model years

Comments are loading…