DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Land Rover Discovery vs 2016 Ford Mustang Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Discovery

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

84.5–83.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeFord
DiscoveryModelMustang
2013Model year2016
SUVBody typeCabriolet
5/7Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

7,9 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5000 ccEngine displacement4951 cc
375 HPPower426 HP
510 NmTorque529 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
86 ltFuel tank60 lt
19,8 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
10,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
14,1 ltAverage consumption12,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size235/50 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4829 mmLength4783 mm
—Width1915 mm
1887 mmHeight1394 mm
2885 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Land Rover Discovery and 2016 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Discovery leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…