DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Ford Mustang vs 2003 BMW X5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

84.75–83.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford MustangSpecificationBMW X5
FordMakeBMW
MustangModelX5
2004Model year2003
CoupeBody typeSUV
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Ford MustangSpecificationBMW X5
—0–100 km/h6,5 s
240 km/hTop speed240 km/h
4606 ccEngine displacement4619 cc
304 HPPower347 HP
427 NmTorque480 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Ford MustangSpecificationBMW X5
PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank93 lt
17 ltUrban consumption21,0 lt
13,6 ltExtra-urban consumption11,4 lt
15,5 ltAverage consumption14,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford MustangSpecificationBMW X5
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/55 R17Tyre size275/40 R20; 315/35 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford MustangSpecificationBMW X5
4765 mmLength4666 mm
1875 mmWidth1872 mm
1385 mmHeight1717 mm
1565 KgWeight2105 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2820 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Ford Mustang and 2003 BMW X5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…