DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2004 Ford Mustang Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

83.75–84.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeFord
Range RoverModelMustang
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h—
208 km/hTop speed240 km/h
4398 ccEngine displacement4606 cc
286 HPPower304 HP
440 NmTorque427 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank61 lt
22,2 ltUrban consumption17 lt
12,6 ltExtra-urban consumption13,6 lt
16,2 ltAverage consumption15,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
255/60 R18Tyre size235/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4950 mmLength4765 mm
1955 mmWidth1875 mm
1860 mmHeight1385 mm
2510 KgWeight1565 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Land Rover Range Rover and 2004 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…