DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Ford Mustang vs 2003 Porsche Cayenne Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

84.75–83.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakePorsche
MustangModelCayenne
2004Model year2003
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,8 s
240 km/hTop speed242 km/h
4606 ccEngine displacement4511 cc
304 HPPower340 HP
427 NmTorque420 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank100 lt
17 ltUrban consumption22,8 lt
13,6 ltExtra-urban consumption11,8 lt
15,5 ltAverage consumption15,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
235/55 R17Tyre size255/55 R18 109Y
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4765 mmLength4782 mm
1875 mmWidth1928 mm
1385 mmHeight1699 mm
1565 KgWeight2225 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2855 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Ford Mustang and 2003 Porsche Cayenne approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…