1996 • Ford
Mustang
Ford Mustang 4.6 V8 GT (215 Hp) 1996Overall Score69.75/100
1996 Ford Mustang vs 1996 Ford Econoline Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Ford
Econoline
Ford Econoline 4.2 i V6 (197 Hp) 1996Overall Score70.5/100
WINNER
Ford Econoline
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MustangSpecificationFord Econoline
FordMakeFord
MustangModelEconoline
1996Model year1996
CabrioletBody typeMinivan
2+2Seats8
2Doors4
Performance
Ford MustangSpecificationFord Econoline
0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4192 cc
215 HPPower197 HP
386 NmTorque339 Nm
8Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MustangSpecificationFord Econoline
PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank132 lt
—Urban consumption16,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption13,1 lt
11,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MustangSpecificationFord Econoline
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/55 R16Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Ford MustangSpecificationFord Econoline
4610 mmLength5382 mm
1824 mmWidth2014 mm
1356 mmHeight2050 mm
1554 KgWeight2370 Kg
2573 mmWheelbase3505 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Ford Mustang and 1996 Ford Econoline approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Econoline leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…