DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Ford Crown Victoria vs 1996 Ford Mustang Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Crown Victoria

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
Crown VictoriaModelMustang
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeCabriolet
6Seats2+2
4Doors2

Performance

180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
193 HPPower215 HP
353 NmTorque386 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank58 lt
18 ltUrban consumption—
10 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/70 R15 STyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5397 mmLength4610 mm
1976 mmWidth1824 mm
1440 mmHeight1356 mm
1720 KgWeight1554 Kg
2905 mmWheelbase2573 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Ford Crown Victoria and 1996 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Crown Victoria leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…