1996 • Ford
Mustang
Ford Mustang 4.6 V8 GT (215 Hp) 1996Overall Score69.75/100
1996 Ford Mustang vs 1996 Ford Crown Victoria Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Ford
Crown Victoria
Ford Crown Victoria 4.6 V8 (193 Hp) 1996Overall Score70.5/100
WINNER
Ford Crown Victoria
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MustangSpecificationFord Crown Victoria
FordMakeFord
MustangModelCrown Victoria
1996Model year1996
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2+2Seats6
2Doors4
Performance
Ford MustangSpecificationFord Crown Victoria
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
215 HPPower193 HP
386 NmTorque353 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MustangSpecificationFord Crown Victoria
PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption18 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10 lt
11,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MustangSpecificationFord Crown Victoria
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/55 R16Tyre size215/70 R15 S
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford MustangSpecificationFord Crown Victoria
4610 mmLength5397 mm
1824 mmWidth1976 mm
1356 mmHeight1440 mm
1554 KgWeight1720 Kg
2573 mmWheelbase2905 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Ford Mustang and 1996 Ford Crown Victoria approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Crown Victoria leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…