DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford Mustang vs 1995 AC Cobra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

78.75–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeAC
MustangModelCobra
2000Model year1995
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
2+2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

5,5 s0–100 km/h5,2 s
240 km/hTop speed215 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4942 cc
324 HPPower370 HP
430 NmTorque579 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank75 lt
18 ltUrban consumption18 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption12 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
245/45 R17Tyre size225/65 VR15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4653 mmLength4115 mm
1857 mmWidth1735 mm
1350 mmHeight1245 mm
1615 KgWeight980 Kg
2573 mmWheelbase2285 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford Mustang and 1995 AC Cobra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…