1999 • Ford
Mustang
Ford Mustang 4.6 V8 32V Cobra (324 Hp) 1999Overall Score77.75/100
1999 Ford Mustang vs 2000 Ford Mustang Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Ford
Mustang
Ford Mustang 4.6 V8 32V Cobra (324 Hp) 2000Overall Score78.75/100
WINNER
Ford Mustang
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
77.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MustangSpecificationFord Mustang
FordMakeFord
MustangModelMustang
1999Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
2+2Seats2+2
2Doors2
Performance
Ford MustangSpecificationFord Mustang
5,5 s0–100 km/h5,5 s
240 km/hTop speed240 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
324 HPPower324 HP
430 NmTorque430 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MustangSpecificationFord Mustang
PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank59 lt
18 ltUrban consumption18 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MustangSpecificationFord Mustang
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
245/45 R17Tyre size245/45 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford MustangSpecificationFord Mustang
4653 mmLength4653 mm
1857 mmWidth1857 mm
1350 mmHeight1350 mm
1615 KgWeight1615 Kg
2573 mmWheelbase2573 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Ford Mustang and 2000 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…