DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Mustang vs 2002 Porsche Cayenne Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

88.5–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakePorsche
MustangModelCayenne
2003Model year2002
CabrioletBody typeOff-road vehicle
2+2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,6 s
280 km/hTop speed266 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4511 cc
390 HPPower450 HP
529 NmTorque620 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank100 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption21,9 lt
10,7 ltExtra-urban consumption11,9 lt
—Average consumption15,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
245/40 R17Tyre size255/55 R 18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4661 mmLength4782 mm
1857 mmWidth1928 mm
1344 mmHeight1699 mm
1745 KgWeight2430 Kg
2573 mmWheelbase2855 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Mustang and 2002 Porsche Cayenne approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…