DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Mustang vs 2002 Jaguar XKR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

88.5–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeJaguar
MustangModelXKR
2003Model year2002
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
2+2Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,4 s
280 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4196 cc
390 HPPower395 HP
529 NmTorque541 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank75 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption18 lt
10,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
—Average consumption12,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
245/40 R17Tyre size245/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4661 mmLength4760 mm
1857 mmWidth2015 mm
1344 mmHeight1296 mm
1745 KgWeight1715 Kg
2573 mmWheelbase2588 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Mustang and 2002 Jaguar XKR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…