DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Mustang vs 2003 Jaguar S-type Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

88.5–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeJaguar
MustangModelS-type
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2+2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,6 s
280 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4196 cc
390 HPPower395 HP
529 NmTorque541 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank68 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption18,5 lt
10,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9,6 lt
—Average consumption12,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
245/40 R17Tyre size245/40 R18; 275/35 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4661 mmLength4861 mm
1857 mmWidth1819 mm
1344 mmHeight1441 mm
1745 KgWeight1800 Kg
2573 mmWheelbase2909 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Mustang and 2003 Jaguar S-type approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…