DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 GMC Safari vs 2005 Ford Mustang Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeFord
SafariModelMustang
2005Model year2005
MinivanBody typeCabriolet
8Seats4
3Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,0 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
4300 ccEngine displacement4009 cc
190 HPPower212 HP
339 NmTorque325 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
102 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Urban consumption12,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/75 R15Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4821 mmLength4765 mm
1968 mmWidth1877 mm
1900 mmHeight1415 mm
2083 KgWeight1625 Kg
2824 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 GMC Safari and 2005 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…