DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Ford Mustang vs 2006 Jeep Wrangler Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeJeep
MustangModelWrangler
2004Model year2006
CabrioletBody typeOff-road vehicle
2+2Seats5
2Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,4 s
180 km/hTop speed174 km/h
3813 ccEngine displacement3956 cc
190 HPPower193 HP
220 NmTorque319 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank72 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre sizeLT 245/75 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4653 mmLength3947 mm
1857 mmWidth1693 mm
1350 mmHeight1764 mm
1455 KgWeight1725 Kg
2573 mmWheelbase2373 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Ford Mustang and 2006 Jeep Wrangler approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…