DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Ford Mustang vs 2005 Jeep Cherokee Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeJeep
MustangModelCherokee
2004Model year2005
CabrioletBody typeOff-road vehicle
2+2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,8 s
180 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3813 ccEngine displacement3700 cc
190 HPPower210 HP
220 NmTorque307 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank76 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption18,6 lt
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption10,3 lt
—Average consumption13 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4653 mmLength4430 mm
1857 mmWidth1820 mm
1350 mmHeight1865 mm
1455 KgWeight1770 Kg
2573 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Ford Mustang and 2005 Jeep Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…