2003 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 3.0 i V6 24V (204 Hp) 2003Overall Score68.5/100
2003 Ford Mondeo vs 2003 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Land Rover
Range Rover
Land Rover Range Rover Range 2.9 TD 24V (177 Hp) 2003Overall Score67.5/100
WINNER
Ford Mondeo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
68.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MondeoSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
FordMakeLand Rover
MondeoModelRange Rover
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford MondeoSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
7,9 s0–100 km/h13,6 s
240 km/hTop speed179 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2926 cc
204 HPPower177 HP
280 NmTorque390 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MondeoSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
56 ltFuel tank100 lt
15,1 ltUrban consumption14,4 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
—Average consumption11,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MondeoSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size255/55 R19
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford MondeoSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
4731 mmLength4950 mm
1812 mmWidth1955 mm
1429 mmHeight1860 mm
1405 KgWeight2500 Kg
2754 mmWheelbase2880 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Ford Mondeo and 2003 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…