2000 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 2.5i V6 (170 Hp) 2000Overall Score65.5/100
2000 Ford Mondeo vs 2000 Land Rover Freelander Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Land Rover
Freelander
Land Rover Freelander 2.5 i V6 24V (177 Hp) 2000Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Ford Mondeo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MondeoSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
FordMakeLand Rover
MondeoModelFreelander
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Ford MondeoSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
—0–100 km/h11,1 s
0 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2544 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
170 HPPower177 HP
220 NmTorque240 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MondeoSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption17,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MondeoSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
215/45 R17Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford MondeoSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
4556 mmLength4433 mm
1751 mmWidth1809 mm
1424 mmHeight1709 mm
1345 KgWeight1550 Kg
2704 mmWheelbase2557 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Ford Mondeo and 2000 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…