DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Ford Contour vs 2000 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mondeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
ContourModelMondeo
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2539 ccEngine displacement2544 cc
170 HPPower170 HP
224 NmTorque220 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank61 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14 STyre size215/45 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4671 mmLength4556 mm
1755 mmWidth1751 mm
1384 mmHeight1424 mm
1257 KgWeight1345 Kg
2704 mmWheelbase2704 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Ford Contour and 2000 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…