DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford Mondeo vs 2000 Audi Cabriolet Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mondeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeAudi
MondeoModelCabriolet
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
206 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1988 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
130 HPPower125 HP
176 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption12,6 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
—Average consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4556 mmLength4366 mm
1751 mmWidth1716 mm
1427 mmHeight1379 mm
1328 KgWeight1370 Kg
2704 mmWheelbase2556 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford Mondeo and 2000 Audi Cabriolet approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…