DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Audi Cabriolet vs 2000 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mondeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeFord
CabrioletModelMondeo
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
195 km/hTop speed206 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
125 HPPower130 HP
173 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank61 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4366 mmLength4556 mm
1716 mmWidth1751 mm
1379 mmHeight1427 mm
1370 KgWeight1328 Kg
2556 mmWheelbase2704 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Audi Cabriolet and 2000 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…