DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Ford Mondeo vs 2010 Volkswagen Caddy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Caddy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeVolkswagen
MondeoModelCaddy
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
200 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
130 HPPower140 HP
320 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16; 205/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4778 mmLength4406 mm
1886 mmWidth1794 mm
1500 mmHeight1823 mm
1503 KgWeight1425 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2681 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Ford Mondeo and 2010 Volkswagen Caddy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Caddy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…