DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volkswagen Caddy vs 2010 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Caddy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeFord
CaddyModelMondeo
2010Model year2010
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h10,9 s
186 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
140 HPPower130 HP
320 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
195/65 R15; 205/55 R16; 205/50 R17Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4406 mmLength4778 mm
1794 mmWidth1886 mm
1823 mmHeight1500 mm
1425 KgWeight1503 Kg
2681 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volkswagen Caddy and 2010 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Caddy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…