2002 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 2.0 DI (115 Hp) 2002Overall Score57.25/100
2002 Ford Mondeo vs 2002 Saab 9-3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Saab
9-3
Saab 9-3 2.0i (130 Hp) 2002Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Ford Mondeo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MondeoSpecificationSaab 9-3
FordMakeSaab
MondeoModel9-3
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5
Performance
Ford MondeoSpecificationSaab 9-3
10,7 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
195 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1985 cc
115 HPPower130 HP
280 NmTorque177 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MondeoSpecificationSaab 9-3
DieselFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank68 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MondeoSpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford MondeoSpecificationSaab 9-3
4731 mmLength4629 mm
1812 mmWidth1711 mm
1429 mmHeight1428 mm
1498 KgWeight1295 Kg
2754 mmWheelbase2605 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Ford Mondeo and 2002 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…