2002 • Saab
9-3
Saab 9-3 2.0i (130 Hp) 2002Overall Score56.5/100
2002 Saab 9-3 vs 2002 Ford Mondeo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 2.0 DI (115 Hp) 2002Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Ford Mondeo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Saab 9-3SpecificationFord Mondeo
SaabMakeFord
9-3ModelMondeo
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5
Performance
Saab 9-3SpecificationFord Mondeo
11,0 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
200 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1985 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
130 HPPower115 HP
177 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Saab 9-3SpecificationFord Mondeo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank56 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
—Average consumption5,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Saab 9-3SpecificationFord Mondeo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Saab 9-3SpecificationFord Mondeo
4629 mmLength4731 mm
1711 mmWidth1812 mm
1428 mmHeight1429 mm
1295 KgWeight1498 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2754 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Saab 9-3 and 2002 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…