DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Ford Mondeo vs 1996 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford MondeoSpecificationAudi 80
FordMakeAudi
MondeoModel80
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Ford MondeoSpecificationAudi 80
13,5 s0–100 km/h18,3 s
180 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
90 HPPower75 HP
134 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford MondeoSpecificationAudi 80
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
61 ltFuel tank0 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption—
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,1 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford MondeoSpecificationAudi 80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford MondeoSpecificationAudi 80
4481 mmLength4482 mm
1749 mmWidth1695 mm
1424 mmHeight1408 mm
1305 KgWeight1355 Kg
2704 mmWheelbase2612 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Ford Mondeo and 1996 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…