DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Audi 80 vs 1996 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationFord Mondeo
AudiMakeFord
80ModelMondeo
1996Model year1996
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationFord Mondeo
18,3 s0–100 km/h13,5 s
160 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1597 cc
75 HPPower90 HP
140 NmTorque134 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationFord Mondeo
DieselFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Urban consumption10,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationFord Mondeo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationFord Mondeo
4482 mmLength4481 mm
1695 mmWidth1749 mm
1408 mmHeight1424 mm
1355 KgWeight1305 Kg
2612 mmWheelbase2704 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Audi 80 and 1996 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…