DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Mondeo vs 2016 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeRenault
MondeoModelMegane
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
200 km/hTop speed197 km/h
998 ccEngine displacement1198 cc
125 HPPower130 HP
170 NmTorque205 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank47 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R16; 235/50 R17; 235/45 R18; 235/40 R19Tyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16; 205/50 R17; 225/45 R17; 225/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4871 mmLength4359 mm
1852 mmWidth1814 mm
1482 mmHeight1447 mm
1455 KgWeight1205 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2669 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Mondeo and 2016 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…