DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Ford Maverick vs 1997 Volvo 940 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 940

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeVolvo
MaverickModel940
1997Model year1997
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

16,7 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
155 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2664 ccEngine displacement2316 cc
125 HPPower131 HP
278 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption12,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,1 lt
—Average consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15 RTyre size185/65 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4665 mmLength4871 mm
1755 mmWidth1750 mm
1850 mmHeight1425 mm
1875 KgWeight1360 Kg
2650 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Ford Maverick and 1997 Volvo 940 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 940 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…