DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Volvo 940 vs 1997 Ford Maverick Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 940

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeFord
940ModelMaverick
1997Model year1997
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h16,7 s
190 km/hTop speed155 km/h
2316 ccEngine displacement2664 cc
131 HPPower125 HP
185 NmTorque278 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank80 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption—
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/65 R15 VTyre size235/75 R15 R
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4871 mmLength4665 mm
1750 mmWidth1755 mm
1425 mmHeight1850 mm
1360 KgWeight1875 Kg
2770 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Volvo 940 and 1997 Ford Maverick approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 940 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…